I was fooling around again recently with some "Wee Planet" stereographic panoramas (previously mentioned here), and came across some tutorials on doing this with Photoshop/GIMP using a Polar Coordinate distortion filter.

While this will give you a

*similar*result to what you might see from a true stereographic projection, it is not quite as aesthetically pleasing I feel. This is because the Polar Coordinate transform is not a

**true**stereographic mapping, and will tend to squish objects in a very non-pleasing way.

I've assembled a few examples to demonstrate the effect and for comparison. The examples here are from Flickr user gadl (Alexandre Duret-Lutz) and are Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Thank you Alexandre for making these available!

And really, what better examples to use than from "La Ville-Lumière", Paris!

### Sacré coeur

I once had a wonderful lunch with some friends not far from here in Montmarte...Starting with the equirectangular panorama projection below:

Running the image through

**Filters → Distorts → Polar Coordinates...**

in GIMP yields the results below...

Notice how the Basilica is squashed in this view. In fact, all of the structures above the horizon have been seriously shortened. Because the polar coordinate transformation is essentially just remapping the image to a circle, notice also that the distance from the center to the outer edges is the same as the height of the source image.

Loading the image into Hugin, though, allows us to remap the output to a true stereographic projection:

The results here are much more aesthetically pleasing, in my opinion. The local angles are preserved, and the relative prominence of objects above the horizon become much larger.

Here's another view:

Here's a view of Notre Dame at night...

In each of these cases I personally much prefer the stereographic projection.

The only drawback of this method is that it requires a full 360° × 360° full panorama of your scene (for best results). This is not always practical if you're shooting on the fly. If the scene you want to capture is

*intended*to be a little planet, it's definitely worth the time to capture a full panorama to map stereographic.

Really nice. I'm clipping this and keep it in mind next time I'm out with my camera. I've always wanted to do one of those little planets.

ReplyDeleteYeah, these are addictive fun once you get started. The beauty is that using Hugin, it's almost trivial to get really good results even with just a bunch of handheld shots...

DeleteI just discovered this myself and I completely agree. I'm new to making these little planets and was frustrated at how squished my planets were, since other ones I had looked at didn't have this problem. What's nice about this also is that it can all be done within Hugin! It really is a great piece of software.

ReplyDelete